Marilinda Garcia is not a new generation conservative

By Matt Barnum

Marilinda Garcia is a 31-year-old Republican running for Congress in New Hampshire’s second congressional district, and she wants you to know that she’s “a new generation conservative.” You can also see here here here here here here and here, to read about just how new generation-y she is. She even has a Buzzfeed page.

But there’s a problem. On the policy issue – gay rights – that most distinguishes old generation and new generation Republicans, Garcia is very wrong. She opposes same sex marriage because, in her words,  “A same-sex couple cannot thus unite, therefore the state has no interest in regulating their relationship…The symbolic message of inclusion for same-sex couples in an institution that makes no sense for them would be coupled with another message: That marriage is about the desires of adults rather than the interests of children.” If those talking points sound familiar, they should. They’re used almost verbatim by the very old-generation-y NOM.

Of course, Garcia’s views are not representative of young Republicans, 61% of whom back marriage equality, which Continue reading

Reply to D.C. McAllister’s “Harry Potter” criticism of gay parents

By Stephen Richer

Dear D.C. McAllister,

You titled your article “The Harry Potter Generation: Denying that kids do best when both biological parents raise them is not just naïve, it’s cruel and abusive.”  Your trick worked.  You got me to trudge through your 38 paragraph criticism of gay parenting just to get to your ONE paragraph about Harry Potter.  Well done.  But don’t you find it a bit ironic that your bait — Harry Potter preaches the toleration of others and even has a scientifically-registered ability to reduce prejudice among its young readers?  Also, Dumbledore is the wisest and most loving character in the book, and he serves as something of a surrogate father to Harry.  Did knowing this, and knowing that Dumbledore is gay, give you pause while writing your article?

As to the substance of your article, I found it to be rubbish (to use a favorite Harry Potter word).  Let’s go through it.

Actual Statistics Of Gay Parenting

You say that children raised by gay parents aren’t complete.  These kids are allegedly spiritually incomplete — a nice, nebulous, non-scientifically measurable term.  You then link to various studies that show that moms are important, dads are important, and two parents are important.  But you never link to studies that compare children raised by two gay parents to children raise by two straight parents.  So I looked for some.  Here’s what I found: Continue reading

Good News for LGBT Catholics? Pope May Remove Anti-Gay Cardinal

By Alexis Hamilton

Cardinal Raymond Burke may be relieved of his duties as head of the Apostolic Signatura and the Roman Curia; the former is the “Supreme Court” equivalent of the Vatican and the latter is a rulemaking body that advises the Pope.

Cardinal Burke shared his views on homosexuality several years ago when he explained the difference between just and unjust discrimination. Unjust discrimination, according to Burke, involves disparate treatment because of a quality like the color of one’s skin, while just discrimination would be discrimination based on something that goes against human nature, like homosexuality.

Don’t worry about being judgmental, though! As Cardinal Burke explains, that sort of discrimination isn’t wrong or immoral, it’s just . . . the truth.

This understanding of church doctrine just might be at odds with that of Pope Francis, who–though he affirmed church doctrine on same-sex marriage–has indicated that the church might not be opposed to same-sex civil unions. The Pope also appointed a progressive bishop as the next archbishop of Chicago.

Can Evangelical Christians Support Marriage Equality?

EFME_BibleAd_version

By Sarah Longwell

According to a recently launched group called Evangelicals for Marriage Equality the answer is “yes”. Their approach focuses on decoupling civil marriage from sacramental marriage, contending that one can be in favor of the former for gay couples, without changing his biblical beliefs about the latter. From the Washington Post:

A new group called Evangelicals for Marriage Equality launched Tuesday (Sept. 9) and is collecting signatures from evangelicals who support same-sex marriage. Its advisory board includes author and speaker Brian McLaren, former National Association of Evangelicals vice president Richard Cizik, and former USAID faith adviser Chris LaTondresse. Cizik resigned from his NAE position over his support for same-sex civil unions.

“Our organization is not taking a theological position on the issue of the sacrament of marriage,” said spokesman Brandan Robertson. “We just want evangelicals to see that it is possible to hold a plethora of beliefs about sexuality and marriage while affirming the rights of LGBTQ men and women to be civilly married under the law.”

The Family Research Council was quick to push-back:

To professing Evangelical advocates of same-sex “marriage:” Stop dissembling. Reject revealed truth concerning human sexual behavior if you will. Christ does not compel faithful discipleship at the point of a gun. Just don’t pretend the Bible doesn’t say what it says or that your personal experiences and/or longings must supersede the commands of the Creator and Redeemer of the universe.

It appears this new organization has its work cut out for it. Evangelicals, even young evangelicals, register some of lowest support for marriage equality:

Research on evangelicals suggest that younger evangelicals are more likely to support same-sex marriage than those of an older generation, though many still resist it.

In 2012, Pew found that 29 percent of young white evangelicals (age 18-29) expressed support for allowing gays and lesbians to marry legally, higher than older evangelicals at 17 percent. That’s far below the level of support for same-sex marriage expressed by young adults as a whole (65 percent).

Godspeed, Evangelicals for Marriage Equality.

Voter ID Laws May Impact Transgender Voters at Midterms

By Alexis Hamilton

MSNBC reports the findings of a recent Williams Institute study, which suggests transgender voters may encounter difficulties at the polls during midterm elections because of some states’ strict voter identification laws. For the transgender individuals who live in those states, updating photo IDs may be “prohibitively difficult and costly.”

States with strict photo ID laws include: Kansas, Texas, Wisconsin, Arkansas, Indiana, Tennessee, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, and Virginia. The Williams Institute study estimated that as many as 25,000 voters might have problems at the ballot box or be disenfranchised because of the voter ID laws.

Though the majority of Americans–about 78 percent according to a Rasmussen Reports Poll–support voter ID laws, it is possible to protect the voting rights of transgender Americans as well as safeguard the voting process from fraud. Alabama, for example, allows voters without a photo ID to cast a provisional ballot and bring an ID to the election office no later than the Friday after election day, or two election officials can give sworn statements affirming that they know the voter. Perhaps voter registration drives and LGBT organizations in states with strict laws should also increase their outreach to transgender voters, make them aware of the ID laws, and inform them about the process of obtaining new identification that will enable them to cast their ballots in November.

There is also at least one website, votingwhiletrans.org, which contains helpful information about required identification and the location of polling places.

Christianity and the unavoidable tide of gay rights

By Matt Barnum

Are Christians immune to the rising tide of LGBT acceptance? That’s the thesis of Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry’s piece for The Week from a couple weeks ago. In it, Gobry argues:

Christianity’s opposition to homosexuality is not the product of some dusty medieval exegete poring over obscure Old Testament verses. From the beginning, what set apart the new and strange sect called Christians from the rest of their culture was their strange sexual ethic.

Today, many gay-marriage proponents don’t just want a live-and-let-live relationship with Christianity — they want to force Christianity to affirm same-sex marriage. They do this, I think, because they believe very strongly in the rights of gays to marry, but also largely because they think that it will only take moderate prodding to get Christianity to cave in. History and Christianity’s own self-understanding suggest, however, that such an outcome is not in the cards.

Note Gobry’s reference to “Christianty,” as opposed to “Christians.” Christianity of course is not a thing that is any way independent of its adherents and leaders, so it’s unclear what Gobry means precisely when he says Christianity.

But let’s take Gobry’s theological explanation at face value; there’s a problem. The question of whether Christians will support homosexuality is an empirical question, rather than a theological one. Theology may of course drive the empirical reality, but it’s bizarre that Gobry’s piece is devoid of any empirical basis, particularly because his hypothesis can be tested so easily.

Check out this Pew survey trend data on religion (third figure down if you click through). As you’ll see, all Christian demographics have seen significant increases in their support for same-sex marriage in just over a decade.

  Support for SSM 2001 Support for SSM 2014
White Mainline Protestants 38% 62%
Catholics 40% 59%
Black Protestants 30% 43%
White Evangelical Protestants 13% 23%

Gee, it sure seems like Christians of all stripes are either changing their minds on same-sex marriage and/or being replaced by a younger, more tolerant generation of believers. Even (the still disturbingly low) support among Evangelical Christians is nearly twice what it was in 2001.

It’s possible that Gobry was referring not to Christians but leaders of Christianity who dictate church’s official policy. Fair enough — after all, most Catholics now support same-sex marriage equality, but church doctrine has yet to follow suit (though the church is making at least rhetorical shifts in a pro-gay direction).

Even if we look at official church doctrine though, Gobry’s thesis fails. A new study finds that more and more religious denominations are accepting gays and lesbians as members and leaders. The study is not all positive – there have been fits and starts – but it’s indicative of an indisputable trend.

And no amount of theology can stop it.

Primary Updates

By Matt Barnum

A couple quick updates from Tuesday’s primary that occurred in several Northeastern states:

-Dan Innis – who we’ve discussed several times on this blog – lost a tough primary 41–49 to former Representative Frank Guinta who will now vie to return to his old Congressional seat. Innis was always the underdog here, running against a former Congressman who had numerous built in advantages. But Innis made a competitive raise of it, and in his concession speech suggested that he may not have given up on politics. Let’s hope not.

-Richard Tisei found out that he will not face incumbent John Tierney again, as expected; Tierney lost his primary to newcomer Seth Moulton. This has upended the race, and unfortunately one poll suggests that Moulton’s victory may make Tisei’s campaign more challenging. We will keep watching this race closely.